It seems only fitting that my
final blog post for the English Department be to welcome someone who will be
coming in to the department as I leave: Professor Eric De Barros. As
Senior Representative to the Chair, I had the pleasure of getting to take Professor
De Barros on a tour of campus with Nick, our Junior Representative to the
Chair, and to have pizza with him and various graduate and undergraduate
English students. I was very excited when I learned Professor De Barros would
be joining the Department and even more excited when he agreed to answer some
questions for the blog.
Where did you attend college?
I’m a proud graduate of the University of
Virginia (UVa).
How did you decide you wanted to have a career
in academia?
I decided the first month or so of college. I’d
always done well enough in school and enjoyed History and English.
However, because of the very practical and materialistic understanding of
education that I took to college, I assumed I would do something that made
economic sense to my family and community, something like law or
medicine. As I said, that all changed early in my first year of college,
when I experienced how seriously my literature and philosophy professors took
their disciplines. Somehow I had no idea that someone could make a career out
of studying literature or other complex ideas. I loved everything about it—the
reading, the research, the interpreting, especially the argumentative
writing—and just went with it.
What is your area of research?
My area of research is early modern (mainly
sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century) English literature with an emphasis
in educational theory and practice. More specifically, I examine how
early modern educational theorists and literary figures variously confront the
tension between the body and discourse or nature and culture to re-think
categories of embodied subjectivity such as race, gender, and
sexuality.
What do you like to do when you are not
teaching/researching?
When I’m not teaching/researching, I’m spending
time with my wife and daughter.
Who has most impacted your
academic life and how so?
I’d have to say the late Richard Helgerson. I
had an opportunity to study with him at UC, Santa Barbara for about two years
early in my graduate education. More than any other scholar-teacher, he modeled
for me that a commitment to students and a love for the classroom were not
incompatible with research excellence.
What is your favorite text? Why?
I’ve enjoyed way too many texts to select one as
my favorite. However, I will say that George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four
was particularly pivotal to my early intellectual development. I read Nineteen
Eighty-Four for the first time when I was about thirteen and was profoundly
struck by the idea that complex, creative expression is itself a revolutionary
act. After the protagonist, Winston Smith, begins his diary, a “thoughtcrime”
punishable by death, he unearths the complex range of emotions and fragmented
memories that the state has systematically attempted to destroy. Those emotions
and memories initially come back to him in the form of a dream, during which he
vaguely remembers things like familial loyalty, maternal love, and erotic
desire. He wakes up from that dream with “Shakespeare” on his lips. In
other words, in an anti-intellectual, authoritarian world, the emotional
richness of Shakespearean expression is nothing short of revolutionary. Though
at the time I didn’t understand it as such, Nineteen Eighty-Four provided
me a compelling defense of literary studies that perhaps explains the ease with
which I was able to accept and follow my interest in literary studies in
college.
What are you most looking forward to next semester when you
will be teaching here at Clark?
I look forward to everything, but especially
the teaching. Once I’m done with this semester at SUNY Oswego, I will begin to
develop the two courses I’ll be teaching in the Fall: Major British Writers I
and Advanced Shakespeare. In both instances, I plan to engage students in a
historicist, gender studies examination of a number of texts. More
specifically, in the first course, I’m thinking of having my students examine
selections from a range of texts— literary, educational, medical, military, travel,
etc. — in the interest of developing a nuanced understanding of and
appreciation for the complex ways in which gender— specifically
masculinity—gets constructed. For the Shakespeare course, I plan to focus this
critical orientation on what I term “the pedagogy of sexual violence.” As
a product of a grammar school education, Shakespeare inherited a classical
tradition rife with scenes of male-defining violence and specifically violence
against women. As I’m thinking about it, one of the governing questions for
this course will be, “Why and how did Shakespeare, the most famous product of
such a tradition, variously and creatively explore and even critique 'the
pedagogy of sexual violence'?” I’m still thinking through both courses, but I’m
really excited to explore these types of issues with Clark students.
What advice would you give to any college
student?
I guess the most important thing is don’t reduce
your education (the major you end up declaring) to an uninspired matter of
technical training deemed most employable or lucrative. Follow what you
enjoy doing—what you love, what you’re passionate about, what you would do for
free—and then figure out how to get paid doing it or something as close to it
as possible. You may or may not get rich this way, but you will definitely
increase your chances of living a happy and fulfilled life.
Welcome to Clark,
Professor De Barros! We are all excited to have you here next semester!